Netflix and not FCP x
Hey all.
I’ve just seen this in Broadcast magazine I’m interested in why Final Cut Pro X is not on the list. Presumably there is a questin about Fcp x’s image processing? I Michael
|
|
James Marsden
Hi Michael
|
|
Nathanaël Havez
I’m also interested into getting more infos about this issue. (Because, yes, I do consider this as an issue) Nathanaël
|
|
I posted the question on twitter as well where someone suggested lack of IMF integration.
toggle quoted message. . .
Could it be this? Michael Sanders: Director of Photography. London based but works globally. reel/credits/kit: www.mjsanders.co.uk m: +44 (0) 7976 269818
On 21 Sep 2018, at 00:07, James Marsden <james_marsden@...> wrote:
|
|
Stu Willis
I posted the question on twitter as well where someone suggested lack of IMF integration. I would strongly suspect that this is the case. We only got closed captioning support this year! FCPX isn't geared towards a traditional drama pipeline either, and I suspect the number of projects originating on FCPX aimed for Netflix is low (although it is great for documentaries). So there simply isn't an incentive for Apple to be beholden to Netflix. Ironically, however, FCPX's metadata driven approach to sound (and timelines in general) is a way better fit for IMF than traditional track-based timelines. --- Stu Willis Edit + Post + FCPX Apologist Melbourne, Australia
|
|
Geoff Boyle
Maybe, just maybe it’s because it’s bloody difficult if not impossible to control exactly what the output of FCP is.
Testing PRR and trying to get predictable levels etc out has not been possible.
From: cml-post-vfx-aces@... <cml-post-vfx-aces@...> On Behalf Of Nathanaël Havez via Cml.News
Sent: 21 September 2018 01:15 To: cml-post-vfx-aces@... Subject: Re: [cml-post-vfx-aces] Netflix and not FCP x
I’m also interested into getting more infos about this issue. (Because, yes, I do consider this as an issue)
Nathanaël
|
|