Web Analytics
Re: Venice evaluation

Re: Venice evaluation


Colin Elves
 

Ah. This is interesting. 

Would this be a level playing field though? 

Isn’t the danger here that you’re, in part, you are now comparing how good the manufacturer’s software is at converting into EXRs? Rather than the camera’s themselves. 

Also: If the manufacturer’s software (or SDK in grading software) is a standard part of the workflow wouldn’t that make it more level? So providing the raw frames would be more representative of how they are used in the ‘real world’. Surely we’re assessing the whole image chain, not just the first part? 

Just playing devil’s advocate here. 

Colin Elves
Director of Photography
Berlin/London




On 24 Mar 2018, at 14:02, Geoff Boyle <geoff.cml@...> wrote:

The idea is to have a level playing field.

Join cml-raw-log-hdr@cml.news to automatically receive all group messages.