Re: Venice evaluation
|
Colin Elves
Ah. This is interesting.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Would this be a level playing field though? Isn’t the danger here that you’re, in part, you are now comparing how good the manufacturer’s software is at converting into EXRs? Rather than the camera’s themselves. Also: If the manufacturer’s software (or SDK in grading software) is a standard part of the workflow wouldn’t that make it more level? So providing the raw frames would be more representative of how they are used in the ‘real world’. Surely we’re assessing the whole image chain, not just the first part? Just playing devil’s advocate here.
On 24 Mar 2018, at 14:02, Geoff Boyle <geoff.cml@...> wrote:
|
|
|