I too am very interested in this thread. I've been shooting with FS7 Cameras for a few years and just finished shooting a feature using FX9 Cameras for the first time. The budget didn't allow for Sony

Alfonso. I look forward to reading your findings. Alister Chapman Cinematographer - DIT - Consultant alister1@... UK Mobile/Whatsapp +44 7711 152226 www.xdcam-user.com Facebook: Alister

Hi again Alfonso. Sony’s logic when designing their cameras and determining base ISO appears to be based on finding the sensors clip point and working down from there. So where you have a 460% curve

Thank you very much Alister for the clarification, I will try to compare the curves with that ISO value and see what it turns out. Alfonso Parra ADFC www.alfonsoparra.com Tel Colombia 57 311

The base ISO’s for S-Cinetone on the FX9 are 320 and 1600. This is of course also 0dB. 0dB is virtually always the native ISO, so to discover the cameras native ISO if it has a dB mode, switch to

We decided to use the dual ISO base settings​​for all the curves and thus be able to compare them to the same ISO value, inthis case with the cinetone curve we use 800 as for the Slog3 curve so

I’m curios Alfonso as to why the S-Cinetone tests were all done with +7dB of gain added? My own testing indicates that adding gain to the S-Cinetone curve reduces the highlight range, results in

Very good, Alfonso. Thank you for taking time to test and share. As usual, very informative. Kind Regards, Pawel Achtel ACS B.Eng.(Hons) M.Sc. “Sharp to the Edge” ACHTEL PTY LIMITED,

Thank you for posting this, I found it informative and helpful. Jessica Gallant West Coast Administrator, CML Director of Photography | Los Angeles |

Dear colleagues, we have published our review of the Sony FX9 camera on the IMAGO website. We hope it is of interest to

This camera has a global shutter. I suspect the camera was still warming up and it needed a fresh black shading. High frame rate systems are a bit more finicky about such things, even the best of

Looks like a rolling shutter. Jeff Kreines Kinetta jeff@... kinetta.com Sent from iPhone.

To add to Bob Kertesz’s cogent post, the phenomenon whereby the color of objects that appear to the eye to be the same, but are rendered differently to different sensors or under different lighting,

Yes, if there's actual IR present. Even when subtle (and depending on the camera/lens/sensor), the changed blacks are the first thing I notice when IR is present, as they usually tend to go a

We noticed lines on our test recordings too and this is why we rejected the Wave camera. Barry Bassett London rental company, VMI

Hi, thank you everyone for your answers, the “fixed pattern noise” seems to be the best description of the issue, I am going to contact Wave Freefly direct and see if they can tell me anymore, or

To be honest, I'd guess that you might be dealing with nothing more complicated than under-exposure here. It's a common thing in slow motion footage from people who haven't tried it, because it's easy

Hi Cynthia- If there’s enough IR pollution then yes, the blacks would be contaminated along with everything else. At lower levels only fabrics and certain materials will noticeably change

Hey Andrew, The sample images you posted look like fixed pattern noise to me, BMD had similar issues with their 1st 4k camera when I recieved it. Black shading is of course easier for everyone

Would shooting through IRND Filters help to even out the blacks reaching the sensor? Cynthia Webster DP Los Angeles 818-524-9773 cynthiacinema@...