Doesn’t have to be inexpensive, I’m just not seeing many options at all :) BTW, thanks for a great article! I’m looking into the Canon-stuff, but I’m also looking to see if there’s anything

I'm not sure there's an inexpensive option right now. I've seen the SmallHDs and so far I'm not a fan. -- Art Adams Director of Photography San Francisco Bay Area www.artadamsdp.com

Unsure if this belongs here or in general or somewhere else, it’s a question about HDR, but about hardware. I’m having a hard time finding any good information about available onset HDR monitors,

Anyone have any luck recording or outputting via HD-SDI a S-LOG3 signal from the Z450 camera? I can turn a setting "on" but I have no luck outputting or recording it and I've been unable to even

Thanks for doing this, Geoff. I own the C200 and am very curious about what you have to say in stage 3! -- Fahnon Bennett Filmmaker/Photographer Brooklyn, New York 323.375.4332 www.vimeo.com/fahnon

I haven't done a direct comparison, because I've been too busy shooting. :) That said, I have submitted some stills shot in stills mode as well as pulled from motion pictures to stock sites and art

I’ve seen the same thing in my tests, too. While it may be the same codec as the one used in the EVA1, it’s likely the upstream processing is different; the GH5 comes from the Lumix division and

Another great comparison test. Interesting to see what different sensors, dynamic range & compression does to the color of her hair. Mostly on the light side of her face. I didn’t expect such

Though the images of the gh5, likely the same 150mbit codec, carries more sharpness also very artifact-free. See our latest test: https://agdok.de/de_DE/kameratest20172 We also didn't see more detail

Though the images of the gh5, likely the same 150mbit codec, carries more sharpeness also very artifact-free. See our latest test: https://agdok.de/de_DE/kameratest20172 Felix Trolldenier AG

I’m a very unusual elf. Colin Elves Short, fat, bald Elf/DP Berlin, testing after a busy night...

Ah, that’s interesting. I’ve only ever recorded 4K to the Odyssey. But I’ll take a look at some of the Dual recorded clips to see if there is indeed a difference! Colin Elves Director of

This isn’t surprising as the EVA records H264 at 150mbps this is a lot lower data rate than the other cameras. I guess it starts the whole argument of initial resolution V compression again. Also as

It’s as sharp as I could get it! Cheers Geoff Boyle Cinematographer EU Based www.gboyle.co.uk +31 (0) 637 155 076

I’ve noticed that internally-recorded files on EVA1 are a bit softer than externally-recorded files (using a PIX-E capturing to ProRes). I also saw this on VaricamLT (ProRes or raw, using

On 12/23/17 03:40, Colin Elves wrote: <Stuff Removed> It’s just my fat face with an old Gretamacbeth chart <More Stuff Removed> I thought Elves were tall and skinny. :-) Robert A. Ober IT

Speaking of which. The EVA is soft on the latest tests as well I think. And I’d still like to know if Red do noise reduction in their processing pipeline though... Merry Christmas everyone! Colin

Depends where it was scaled. I notice in photoshop for example it doesn't offer any decent scaling in 32 bit mode. If you take the EXR and convert it to 8 bit and scale that then you get a similar

Yeah, there's something not right with that Helium JPEG. Knowing that the test was shot at 7K is an important clue. Following the 80% rule, that would drop effective resolution to 5.6K. Also, if these

Well, here's me with egg on my face! I’ve just had a look at the camera original EXRs and the Helium does indeed have more resolution. So that’s that one sorted. Now we just need to get to the