You may want to have a read of this: https://www.lightspace.lightillusion.com/uhdtv.html We explained the issues with HDR in the real world to Dolby when they first introduced PQ HDR, and that is exac

I'll be really interested to see how any WOLED can be calibrate for accurate HDR. With the inherent non-additive nature of WOLEDs it is technically just not possible. (They can do SDR with a high reso

You can see display and environment requirements here: https://www.lightillusion.com/viewing_environments.html Steve

There is a fair bit of info here too: https://www.lightillusion.com/data_tv_levels.html But, there are more than two forms of LUTs required, as while Extended and Legal are the main requirement, some

As the display is not a HDR display, that really shows that using a gamma that is not the default Rec709 will produce the better images. That is what a colourist does naturally. Steve

As has been proven each and every time, I never state anything that isn't fact. As shown here, with the irrefutable information on the volumetric issues with the Panasonic WOLED. I make sure any state

“The Eizo CG3145 qualifies as a Dolby Vision mastering monitor” That is what I was referring to when I used the word 'certified', as I suspect that anyone would take such a statement to mean something

Should add/ask - if using a professional HDR display there should be no need for any metadata to be sent to the display to enable HDR mode. The display should just be calibrated for an HDR input (PQ o

<quote>Regarding the LG C8 - Steve would know better than I, but yes they are quite easy to calibrate, but they have limitations as has been discussed.</quote> They can only be calibrated for SDR (not

<quote>...instead of the AJA Hi5 4k plus, are there any similarly priced options from BlackMagic that do the same thing? (HDR flag capable etc). Just to integrate better with Resolve. And are these LG

I actually like the way FSI define their range of 'HDR' displays. Monitoring HDR Designed for production and quality control applications. Useful as a cost-effective HDR pre-visualization tool. Monito

Just so every one really has the correct information... The Panasonic TX-65EZ952B uses the LG WOLED screen, as does every large format 'OLED' out there. The graphs I posted are actually FROM the Panas

To add some factual data to the 'Panasonic' display issues, this is a direct comparison on the Panasonic compared to an 'ok' LCD HDR display, both profiled in HDR mode, but with a power law gamma, to

You are correct - it has ABL/Power saving issues, not haloing. My bad! It is other LCD displays (mainly home TVs) that have limited backlight zones. We've been doing so many display/TV evaluations lat

The Eizo Prominance CG3145 is certified for HDR mastering, and suffers none of the issue the Sony X300 has, as it has a 'backlight per pixel'. The Sony suffers ABL/ASBL type power saving issues. With

The Panasonic uses the LG WOLED screen, and cannot accurately do any form of HDR - regardless what the marketing hype says. See: https://www.lightillusion.com/error.html#hdr_volume (You may need to cl

I would suggest the FSI XM310K. (Or potentially the Eizo Prominence CG3145.) Both are far better than the Sony. Steve

I actually am not sure which 'Steve' you are asking (this new CML message workflow can be a bit difficult to follow at times...). But, assuming it is me - send me the LUTs and I'll assess them for you

We do not recommend BT1886 for display calibration, as the 'variable' component is ill thought-out. It will 'wash-out' shadows on displays with blacks that are not close to zero. We recommend all cali