Web Analytics

VFX on Sony Venice: X-OCN XT or Raw?


Emmanuel SUYS
 

Greetings,

 

For an upcoming series we are using multiple Venice Cameras (1. Generation not the Venice2) and are planning to film most of the project in X-OCN ST.

Regarding the VFX shots, my understanding is that X-OCN XT is largely sufficient and has even a slight advantage over the Raw Format.

We are going initially for a 5.7K 16:9 (5674 x 3192): 23.98p framerate project. So, in Raw would be then having to end up on a 3.8K 16:9 (3840 x 2160): 23.98p Framerate.

Or am I missing something? What would be the advantage of going the Sony Raw route vs X-OCN XT?

 

 

Appreciate any information/explanation or guidance.

 

Cheers,

Manny

 

Emmanuel SUYS 
Cinematography - Kinematografie - Photographie Cinématographique 
*16-35-HD-HiSpeed-UW 
*HiSpeed Operator- UW Operator 
*Digital On Set Supervision 
*European based 
- BVK
*Mobil +491734537858 *emmanuel at suys.de 

 


Pawel Achtel, ACS
 

Ø  For an upcoming series we are using multiple Venice Cameras (1. Generation not the Venice2) and are planning to film most of the project in X-OCN ST.

Ø  Regarding the VFX shots, my understanding is that X-OCN XT is largely sufficient and has even a slight advantage over the Raw Format.

Ø  We are going initially for a 5.7K 16:9 (5674 x 3192): 23.98p framerate project. So, in Raw would be then having to end up on a 3.8K 16:9 (3840 x 2160): 23.98p Framerate.

Ø  Or am I missing something? What would be the advantage of going the Sony Raw route vs X-OCN XT? [Emmanuel SUYS]

 

Any particular reason you would not shoot with a single camera?

It sounds like unnecessary complication, setup time and expense.

 

Disclosure: My company makes 9x7 digital cinema cameras specifically designed for VFX plates, IMAX and Giant Screen.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Pawel Achtel ACS B.Eng.(Hons) M.Sc.

ACHTEL PTY LIMITED, ABN 52 134 895 417

“Sharp to the Edge”

 

Member of:

ACS Technical Committee

GSCA Board of Directors and Technical Committee

IMAGO Technical Committee

 

Website: www.achtel.com

Mobile: 040 747 2747 (overseas: +61 4 0747 2747)

Mail: PO BOX 557, Rockdale, NSW 2216, Australia

Email: Pawel.Achtel@...

Facebook: facebook.com/PawelAchtel

Twitter: twitter.com/PawelAchtel

Skype: Pawel.Achtel

_,_


Emmanuel SUYS
 

 

 

From: <cml-raw-log-hdr@...> on behalf of "Pawel Achtel, ACS" <pawel.achtel@...>

 

Any particular reason you would not shoot with a single camera?

It sounds like unnecessary complication, setup time and expense.

 

Greetings,

 

Filming with 2 and more cameras, on Features, TV-Dramas and Series, is almost standard nowadays.

 

Cheers Manny

 

Emmanuel SUYS 
Cinematography - Kinematografie - Photographie Cinématographique 
*16-35-HD-HiSpeed-UW 
*HiSpeed Operator- UW Operator 
*Digital On Set Supervision 
*European based 
- BVK
*Mobil +491734537858 *emmanuel at suys.de 

 

 


Miga Bär
 

Hi Emmanuel, 

In my experience X-OCN XT is absolutely sufficient for any type of VFX work, especially when shooting 5.7K. Depending on the type of VFX work and your delivery format(s), X-OCN ST will even be good enough for a lot of different types of VFX work. For instance, if you don't have to pull incredibly specific keys, aren't shooting in extreme low-light conditions and you're not finishing for Dolby Cinema, there's a good chance that ST will do the trick for most shots. That being said, I would recommend to discuss with your VFX vendor what their experiences with the various X-OCN levels are and what their preference would be for this specific production. Maybe even run some tests to see when XT is really beneficial over ST. In my experience it really depends on the type of work done and your shooting conditions.  
As far as I know there are no reasons left to shoot RAW SQ on a Sony Venice. I've never tested them against each other but have also never seen that X-OCN XT didn't have enough information to get the job done. 

Best, 

Miga Bär
Workflow Consultancy
The Netherlands


Elvis Ripley
 

Another vote for XOCN ST being great. Did a show and tested with VFX company, ST was plenty. We shot full sensor 3:2 so VFX had more scene information for tracking.  
--
Elvis Ripley
Director/DP/Post
Tulsa, OK, USA
elvisripley.com


Emmanuel SUYS
 

Hello Miga, Hello Elvis,

 

Thanks for the input. That was also my understanding from reading some papers from Sony and other sources. Of course will follow whatever VFX  requires, just wanted to have some base before going to meeting. Testing is anyway planned, so will see what the final decision will end up to be.

 

Best regards from Upper Bavaria,

Manny

 

 

 

 

From: Miga Bär <barmiga@...>
In my experience X-OCN XT is absolutely sufficient for any type of VFX work, especially when shooting 5.7K..,

That being said, I would recommend to discuss with your VFX vendor what their experiences with the various X-OCN levels are and what their preference would be for this specific production.. ..

As far as I know there are no reasons left to shoot RAW SQ on a Sony Venice. I've never tested them against each other but have also never seen that X-OCN XT didn't have enough information to get the job done. 

 

From: Elvis Ripley <4@...>
Another vote for XOCN ST being great. Did a show and tested with VFX company, ST was plenty. We shot full sensor 3:2 so VFX had more scene information for tracking.  

 

 

Emmanuel SUYS 
Cinematography - Kinematografie - Photographie Cinématographique 
*16-35-HD-HiSpeed-UW 
*HiSpeed Operator- UW Operator 
*Digital On Set Supervision 
*European based 
- BVK
*Mobil +491734537858 *emmanuel at suys.de