Date
1 - 4 of 4
locked Faulty camera evaluations
|
Far from being faulty if the evaluations reveal issues they are doing exactly what they are meant to do.
Just as in the past we have found and got fixed a number of things that could have been problematic.
Geoff
On my way to a Michelin starred restaurant to celebrate our 41st anniversary.
It's actually on the 1st but some organisation has pre-booked it.
Sent from BlueMail
|
|
|
|
Mitch Gross
“Far from being faulty if the evaluations reveal issues they are doing exactly what they are meant to do.”
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Bingo! The manufacturers all read this, or at least they all damn well better. If there’s something that’s not working right then guess who should be working to address it? Happy Anniversary Geoff. Mitch Gross Cinema Product Manager Panasonic Media Entertainment Company New York
On Mar 28, 2018, at 8:26 AM, Geoff Boyle <geoff@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Argyris_Theos_cml
Happy anniversary! All this discussion has been fun but I think it distracted us from the true object "How good of a camera is Venice?" The "other thread" began with "we got ourselves a new benchmark" and got to "mr X knows software A better than mr Y, who knows software B better than mr Z who knows software C better than mr W who knows software D better than mr V who values his friends too much to assume the role of a referee" So in the end the question is simple: "Is Venice worth it's money?" It is like movies. If the movie is good everybody loves the cinematography. If the movie %}}#^^{%, then cinematography %}}#^^{% as well My 2 Eurocents Argyris Theos, gsc DoP, Athens Greece, +306944725315 Skype Argyris.Theos via iPhone
|
|
|
|
Gary
First Geoff a big thank you for doing the reviews as most "Camera Persons" cant criticise the camera, or the thing on the end of there arm that is supposed to give Rembrandt works of art, under interesting and varied conditions every time the button is pushed.All the very best and keep up the good work.. Gary filmandtape UK
On 28 March 2018 at 13:26, Geoff Boyle <geoff@...> wrote:
|
|
|